Thoughts of an American Centrist

Wednesday, May 18, 2005

The Owen Missle Crisis

The war over judicial nominations started today, and we're going to take our hats off to Charging RINO for a play by play of some of the more interesting exchanges that have taken place on the floor today. The true zinggers of the day have been coming from Chuck Schumer:

"The Senate has passed 95% of President Bush's judicial nominees. Now, if your child came home from school and said they got a 95% on their test, would you pat them on the head and say 'good job'? Or would you tell them to cheat and break the rules until they reached 100%?"

Breathtaking.

Think Progress has uncovered yet more hypocricy by reporting and analyzing this skirmish between Schumer and Frist:

SEN. SCHUMER: Isn’t it correct that on March 8, 2000, my colleague [Sen. Frist] voted to uphold the filibuster of Judge Richard Paez?

SEN. FRIST: The president, the um, in response, uh, the Paez nomination - we’ll come back and discuss this further. … Actually I’d like to, and it really brings to what I believe - a point - and it really brings to, oddly, a point, what is the issue. The issue is we have leadership-led partisan filibusters that have, um, obstructed, not one nominee, but two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, in a routine way.

Think Progress agues:

So, Frist is arguing that one filibuster is OK. His problem is that several Bush nominees have been filibustered. This position completely undercuts Frist’s argument that judicial filibusters are unconstitutional. (Which is, in turn, the justification for the nuclear option.) If judicial filibusters are unconstitutional there is no freebee.

Who ever said "Star Wars" was the biggest show in town?